The emergence of paedophile abuse in the Hungarian public sphere is not a new phenomenon; abuse and violence against children received significant media attention from the turn of the nineteenth to the twentieth century, especially from the 1920s onwards. The contemporary press regularly reported on sexual crimes committed against minors. The aim of this study was to analyse and interpret the representation of paedophile crimes in the Hungarian press in the first half of the twentieth century, as well as to examine specific sexual crimes that attracted particular attention using microhistorical methods. Based on various search terms (child molestation, cradle snatcher, satyr, sexual abuse of children, etc.), Arcanum (an online Hungarian database for historical journals) alone records thousands of press appearances during the period under review. The analysis focused particularly on how the news appears across different press outlets (sensationalism, opinion pieces, social drama, etc.), the scope and prominence of reports, and how the perpetrator and victim(s) were portrayed. What do we learn about them (social status, occupation, other crimes, etc.)? How were the journalist’s opinions, public sentiment, and social reactions presented within the reports? What political, social, or other factors might explain these trends? How can the Hungarian press be characterised within an international context?

Nincs absztrakt.

In the past few decades the overwhelming majority of historical research studying testaments followed quantitative methods. The leading British, French, and American scholars of the field fashioned themselves in robust examinations and applied a systematic statistical approach to last wills. Among others, Wilbur Kitchner Jordan, Michel Vovelle, Pierre Chaunu, Jacques Chiffoleau, and Samuel K. Cohn categorized and counted charitable giving as found in the testaments in order to investigate pious practices. They argued that registering shifts in the patterns of pious activities indicated longue durée or sudden mental changes among the testators. They provided a powerful model, which exhibited that measuring religious attitudes was actually feasible and a fruitful scientific enterprise. Other historians pointed out the scantiness of serialized methods and drew attention to a number of problems a quantitative historian has to face with when translating the narrative archival sources into a column of figures. They challenged and harshly criticized the practice of recording masses of data, homogenizing a unique and individualistic historical source, and most importantly, expressed deep-seated skepticism towards decoding secularizing attitudes. They proposed an alternative reading and understanding of the testament and suggested more qualitative methodology. After reviewing the potentials and limitations of the various inquiries, the author reveals her own experiences as a historian who also devoted herself to the exploration of testaments. Finally, she elucidates the advantages of integrating last wills into individual life stories, reconstructing the historical accounts of one’s past actions and biographical details, and putting personal records into the center of historical analysis. Meticulous microscopic scrutiny does not only allow the historian to reconstruct biographical tales that, unquestionably, hold amazingly imposing fictional qualities, but also leads us into an impressively vivid arena of legal conflicts stirred by ambiguous final decisions.